AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Landr mastering algorithm1/18/2024 ![]() Then take a track that is in bad shape premaster and do the same. Take a track that you think is sounding good premaster and put it through all the services you're interested in. You could put the track up on Bandlab, for example.īTW: if you're trying to decide the best service, do this simple test. Thanks I check it out! This is the master from LANDR I did, I'mm not really an expert and I'm mixing with headphones at home but on forums the claimed is very hARSH and distorted, like if it's clipping? What do you think about it? CHeck when the drums startsĭo you have somewhere else to listen to the track? No offense but I prefer not to download stuff from Google drive accounts. I've got my own preset that I work with (tweaking where necessary). Izotope generally give s you the most flexibility. This was done with Bandlab: Listen to Fake News by 53mph on #SoundCloud This was done with landr: Listen to Leaving HITRECORD Instrumental remix by 53mph on #SoundCloudīandlab can be good but it can be a bit heavy handed on the compression. I've had good results from them, and they will always get the volume to broadcast levels.just make sure your original track is of decent audio dynamics as Landr cannot perform miracles on a crappy track. I've used Landr, Bandlab and I use izotope. What do you think about the result? this is my mastered trackĬonsider I recorded everything at home with plugins. I'd also try having a track professionally mastered sometime then compare it to AI or your own mastering skills as a reference. One thing I would keep in mind is that your mix should basically sound the way you want it to before having it mastered, whether it's using AI or professionally done. (BandLab has this free mastering feature, you might want to give it a shot too.) I'm not saying one can't get good results just be aware of what it does, what it can & can't do. I expect that though because AI only compares & adjusts your track against an algorithm, it's not actually hearing it so naturally there's many variables it can't account for. I'm not an M/E by any stretch but I always prefer my own results. The sort of language they use is very diplomatic but to be honest if you don’t feel you have the skills to mess around with mastering plug-ins or the money to send it to a mastering house then this is a really attractive option.I've tried several AI mastering services since they started a few years ago including LANDR. It can certainly give you an idea of how good it could sound if mastered properly, or if you need something in a hurry. They call it a “production companion” and talk a lot about the science of mastering and how LANDR is designed by sound engineers as a useful tool. They don’t claim that it can replace a human’s ears and experience but it many cases it probably can. LANDR is a very cleverly constructed artificial intelligence based on algorithms designed to mimic the techniques and skills of “top” mastering engineers. The SONAR tie-in gives you two free low-res MP3’s per month which, if you’re anything like as prolific as I am, will be plenty. ![]() You can export and preview the result as much as you like but if you want to download the result you have to sign up and start per file or via a subscription. ![]() At any time during your music making you can export a mix to LANDR and see how it might sound as an end product. The integration comes in the form of a desktop app that is launched whenever you select LANDR from the export menu – so it’s less like integration and more like a companion really. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |